Sigh

The Tarlach's record can also be interpreted so that it refers to the players as the knight of light, rather than Lugh. As we are also calleed the Knight of Light in G3 and supposedly when speaking to NPCs with the G3 title on(?). There isn't enough evidence to say Lugh is a god, milletian, or human, if you ask me. But there isn't enough evidence to the contrary to say he cannot be. Just don't include definites like "he is", "he isn't", or failing to mention it at all, if you ask me. (I know you didn't, I should stop doing this. . .)

If you want to draw the line...simply call him a Human with superior power/intellect...his actions echoed throughout the land and his story was told countless times, with many exaggerations. He could very well still be a human of old age, who's gone mad, or cynical if you will. Granted, I don't have enough evidence to support this, but from his looks, he's clearly human. I'm also pretty positive of race stating what he is as of now...rather than what he was in the past. Mabye he's a demigod, hell should I know.

I agree, the lack of mention won't bode well.

I, personally, would have left it at Human for both Lugh and Morgant. They are still human, just with superior strength/intellect. Honestly, it'll end up boiling down to the in-game information.

I think there's too much contradictions to leave it as "Human."

Well it's up to the wiki community to decide...my statement still stands about drawing the line at just Human, regardless of all the books since he is only human. This applies to Morgant too.

While we're on the subject of Tarlach's Record:

“	This book is a collection of data I have gathered over some time, especially from stories told by the Knight of Light, who has, incidentally, returned to Erinn most recently.	„

The part where it says "stories" and "returned to Erinn". It's probably leading to a speculation-wormhole, but

• Has Lugh EVER preached about the Milletian race? Did any Tuatha de Danann NPC know about the Milletians before we shoved the book into Eavan/Aodhan's hands?
• Lugh the Knight of Light didn't return during G3. Morgant, in a way, even said he's gone.

It may refer to the Milletian. Lugh had already vanished. Knight of Light may be referred to as a title, rather than Lugh himself.

Yes, that's my conclusion (and Kapra's I think) as well. But no, its one of those things people on the IRC call "crap". In any case, I've pointed out critical points in the book that may be driving to the player and not Lugh.

It's "crap" because it's still all your speculation and interpretation (plus bad writing evidently). It's this sort of thing that leads to the rubbish we had on Aer's page about her possibly being Macha which was specifically removed by an admin.

Thread:Talk:Morgant/Morgant_=_Human/reply_(7)