Mabinogi World Wiki is brought to you by Coty C., 808idiotz, our other patrons, and contributors like you!!
Want to make the wiki better? Contribute towards getting larger projects done on our Patreon!

Talk:Instinctive Reaction

From Mabinogi World Wiki

is this the same as Maize Red Ghost's auto-counter? -- Ladywinter 07:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I doubt it because I recently did FH with a friend and did not observe such a move, but I also do not know what their "auto counter" is.--Neouu84 20:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Bandersnatches

Don't they have instinctive reaction?..or is it not high enough to be put on the list?--♫ѕταя♪ 14:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

According to race.xml, all types of Bandersnatches have all of their skills, including instinctive reaction, at rank F.--Sozen Cratos Focker 15:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Slate?

They don't really have it at a high enough rank to be noticable. I can smash them easily enough, not at all like Gorgons. BladeBlade 06:49, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree, neither slate nor black wizard should be on this list, I primaarily use smash against both of them. Never encountered any dificulty.--Neouu84 20:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Gorgon Rank?

Just wondering what their rank would be, because their auto reaction rate is far higher than 50% when not previously engaged, but according to the chart that is the Rank 1 value. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neouu84 (talkcontribs) . Please always sign your comments with the Signature.png button or by typing ~~~~!

Perhaps everything above 50% is still considered to be rank 1. Pyrus 12:31, 22 May 2011 (UTC)


Player Rank?

Has anyone tested this? I am under the impression that all players have it but would love to know how high of a rating we get. --Azureshock 4:18, 20 April 2013

Players don't have this skill. We might have the ability associated with the skill, but the activation rate is way less than what this skill sets it to at rank F. In fact, it's so rare that players doing it might be a bug.Sozen Cratos Focker (talk) 02:25, 20 June 2013 (PDT)

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
cluttered skill details1118:39, 3 September 2012

cluttered skill details

The skill details per rank should probably be placed into a table when someone has the time to do it :x

Yinato18:57, 8 May 2012

It does seem cluttered now that I look at it...

S•A•R•I•A18:59, 8 May 2012
 
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 18:39, 3 September 2012

Well I got...this:

Rank F E D C B A 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Knockdown Gauge Difference (%) >40 >40 >40 >40 >40
Engagement Chance (%) 20 40 60 80 100

It gets tricky at A+ o.e I don't quite know how to put it...

S•A•R•I•A19:07, 8 May 2012
 

At rA+, the chance drops if the enemy gauge is the same as the player's gauge. So if both were at 0% filled, the chance would be placed in brackets or something. I forgot to add that at r5+, the skill can kick in even if the monster wasn't fighting anything to begin with. work against multiple attackers. (I need sleep o-e)

Yinato19:10, 8 May 2012
 
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 18:39, 3 September 2012

So like this for ranks A-6:

Rank F E D C B A 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Knockdown Gauge Difference (%) >40 >40 >40 >40 >40 ≠ [=] ≠ [=] ≠ [=] ≠ [=] ≠ [=]
Engagement Chance (%) 20 40 60 80 100 100 [20] 100 [40] 100 [60] 100 [80] 100


I'm shooting blanks at this point...feel free to pick this up o.e

S•A•R•I•A19:15, 8 May 2012
 
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 18:39, 3 September 2012
Rank F E D C B A 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Engagement Chance (%)
Knockdown Gauge Difference = 40%
20 40 60 80 100
Engagement Chance (%)
Knockdown Gauge Difference = 0%
- - - - - 20 40 60 80 100
Engagement Chance (%)
(At any time)
- - - - - - - - - - 10 20 30 40 50

This is what I have. Let me know if anything doesn't make sense.

Yinato19:37, 8 May 2012
 

OH...that's actually much more understandable. o.o

S•A•R•I•A19:39, 8 May 2012
 
Edited by 2 users.
Last edit: 18:38, 3 September 2012

I would suggest something like this:

Rank F E D C B A 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Engagement Chance (%)
Vs new enemy w/ Knockdown Gauge difference >40
20 40 60 80 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Engagement Chance (%)
Vs new enemy w/ equal Knockdown Gauge
0 0 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 100 100 100 100 100
Engagement Chance (%)
Vs Preemptive attack
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 20 30 40 50

A brief explanation and example might be necessary, though. And the first row should ideally be more concise.

What the - darn, I got ninja'd. -.-

Akira19:39, 8 May 2012
 

So I guess it's just preference over Akira's table and mine then. or not (double ninja'd?)

Yinato19:41, 8 May 2012
 

Okay, I'll add the table then lol. I better not get ninja'd :/

Yinato19:43, 8 May 2012
 

I'd still suggest the explanation and example, though. (And I thought, for the first one, it had to be a difference over 40, not equal to?)

Akira19:56, 8 May 2012
 

Oh whoops. I'll change that quickly. Mind adding the explanation? I'm about to turn in for the night.

Yinato19:57, 8 May 2012