Too much speculation and personal opinion

Pyro; Read my points again. And again. And again. And again. "[person] said Lugh is a God" isn't the issue. The issue is that "[person] said Lugh is a God" doesnt mean "Lugh is a God" and you can't enter Lugh in the "Gods" page on that basis. A mention of the fact that there was a source claiming Lugh was a God is fine but doesn't really belong on this page.
Actually it is relevant because previously the claim on the page was "these Gods are capable of death" with the implication that the others weren't. Otherwise, showing that certain Gods have died and have come back is okay.
Relevance, importance and notability.
I'm doubtful of the benefit of it, as it is I took a quick vote and Mugenia, Linkoln and Skitty all voted against.