Too much speculation and personal opinion

@Akira I beg to differ. First off it's trivia of minor importance that we're not even sure of and it's still related to him. If it's an inconsistency on the part of anything it's an inconsistency on the part of the story rather than the gods or Shakespeare. Furthermore we're still not even entirely sure of what various groups of Gods are/aren't restricted too which makes it more speculation than fact. We have seen Cichol "die" with our own eyes and seen him come back. We have the words of others that Nuadha died and of his return. It's too limited in scope and there are too many other gods that have displayed other traits for any of us to truly say otherwise. In light of that it'd be irresponsible to say so.
@Pyrus You didn't prove anything. I asked again and again for clear solid proof and it has yet to be shown. You're not performing up to the standards asked for and behaving of your own accord without consulting others thoroughly to serve your own ends. An arbitrary vote held by a biased party that no one agreed to is outright facetious and even almost insulting. You're not even trying to work with me here, just yourself.
@Infodude I have yet to see a compelling argument for why they "deserve to be here". The (lack) of significance and notability makes me think otherwise. If it's just that they're descendants then the information can be combined with the progenitors.
I have constantly asked for real, solid proof. Do NOT act when this has yet to be addressed.