Talk:Transformations Comparisons

Would it be okay to put stat bonuses gained from the transformation stats in parenthesis? For example: Paladin's 250 dex gives (+16.667) to Armor Pierce.

Perhaps in a different table to avoid confusion?

I'm fine with that.

Actually, won't that cause unnecessary stretching? The table is already a page long for me.

We could put it in a hidden text tag.

Purpose?

Looks like a very confusing high-low highlighting.

Blue means it has the highest value in comparison to other transformations, red means lowest. (For ones Dark Knights only have a chance of being the highest, I put them and the second highest at the same coloring.) I'll edit the page to reflect that.

Sorry, to clarify that, I meant the "Transformations" page, not Paladin, Dark Knight, Savage Beast, etc. And what I meant by double bolding is, look at the Falcon page now, look at the word Falcon in the table.

The transclusion doesn't even link back to the transformation page, so that's not going to be of much help. Nevermind. The header links to the page. Also, the comparisons are not quite useful, since by the time you even read the comparison page, you probably have a character in the game already; since they're pretty much all race-locked (except pally<->dk), it's pretty much too late to decide on your transformation.

And, the Falcon page one was linking back to falcon page because it was linking to the redirect, not the actual page.

I think a comparison is necessary, especially for Paladins and Dark Knights. Its a serious choice since you can't ever revert, and the chart helps weigh out options.